Painless Childbirth, revisited

Lately, my Understanding "Painless" Childbirth post has gotten a lot of attention. I'm so glad, because much of what is in it is so important for women to know. I have gotten a few comments from women who experienced painless childbirth without hypnosis. I think these stories are awesome and they fit right in with the ideology that birth doesn't have to be painful. Here is one of the comments, explaining the various degrees of comfort for her five births.

[. . . ]I experienced almost painless childbirth with and without drugs and never used hypnosis. I think it is different for everyone..[. . . ]In five births, number one and two were painless with drugs. Number three was painful. Number four was not painful until the last ten seconds and number five was painless

I just started focusing on reassuring the baby and the surges never got painful with four and five. The crowning was not painful on number three and number five.

The contractions hurt on number three (possibly because I was panting to keep the baby in on the dash to the hospital.)

Notice her theory that fighting against what her body wanted to do in order to get to the hospital before giving birth may have caused more pain that was necessary. I have been meaning to write about why I feel my second birth became uncomfortable during second stage, after I was almost completely comfortable for first stage, including transition.

My birth plan said "limit vaginal exams to those I request, unless necessary for a medical decision." This request was ignored soon after my OB started to tell I was getting pushy. She had me get into a good position to be checked (big mistake #1 was getting into that position in the first place, big mistake #2 was not getting out of it) and when I was found to have just a lip of cervix left, she continued to check periodically without saying anything. I didn't really mind much at the time since I was really focused on relaxing through the waves, but I do understand why some women feel violated by things like that. I had read about the flaws of the rule of 10 and wanted to be able to push a little if I felt like it even though I was not "10 centimeters." At first, my OB's advice supported this, and she encouraged me to push only as much as I felt I had to. The waves felt different and I began to vocalize through them, because it felt better to, but I was still using my hypnosis and staying comfortable. I don't know how much time passed, but she must have gotten impatient, so she wanted to try holding back the lip of cervix and having me push, which was extremely uncomfortable.

All of you who work with birthing women, this is important, during birthing, our brains sometimes don't clearly interpret what you mean when you say things to us. When trying to hold back the lip of cervix didn't make it go away, my OB told me to try not to push, though I think now she must have meant to only push as much as I had to, but in my confused birth-brain, I read it as "don't push at all" which was very different from what my body was telling me to do, and I think greatly increased the discomfort and, I dare say, pain that I experienced. It is likely that the fighting my body and the confusion caused the pain, not necessarily the pressure waves. When she started telling me I could push, obviously that implied the lip was gone, but again, I had birth-brain. This (and not getting out of that bed) is why I think I ended up needing to be coached to push him out. Once I started really pushing, it wasn't really painful anymore. Crowning didn't really hurt to me either, just felt like really intense stinging.

Here is another comment from a woman who experienced a painless birth:

I had a painless birth with my fifth baby. It was so painless that I didn't realize it was real until he was crowing. (Luckily my husband recognized subtle changes in my mood and called the midwife, who arrived just in time.)

I did not do hypnosis. I just practiced relaxing my perineum with each braxton hicks. When I was lying in bed, in active labor, I thought I was having BH contractions so I just kept relaxing my perineum.

It didn't even hurt when he was crowning. I tore a little and that stung but not bad at all.

For the record: My son was 10lb 6oz and I have a ridiculously low pain threshold

That is pretty amazing. Her comments illustrate beautifully that women do not have to have an unusually strong ability to endure pain to have enjoyable natural birth experiences--it is not an issue of how much pain you can take, but how you choose to think about the sensation you're experiencing.

In both this story and the previous, the moms did not have the painless experience until they had already been through birth before. These women have probably found a solution to the fear problem by experiencing birth. Since they have done it before, they don't need to fear the unknown. Thinking you're not really in labor would probably reduce the fear, too.

Here is another one, from a midwife

[. . .] I had painless childbirth with all my babies. I think it was because I did unassisted births and no one talked to me or touched me while in active labor. I was able to go into the zone and time seemed to stand still. But every time I looked at the clock an hour had gone by. When it was over I felt like I had just had the best sex ever. I was 17 and had a 5 and 1/2 hour labor with my first.

As a midwife, I try to allow my moms to go to that zone, but I also have to listen to the baby, give drinks of water, etc. I tell my apprentices not to talk to her, just support as they see a need and be aware of the mom's response.

I have discussed unassisted birth before. I do think that women are likely to have more comfortable birth experiences if they can be undisturbed. Undisturbed birth does not necessarily have to be unattended. If a doctor or midwife can act as a lifeguard, then a "best of both worlds" birth is possible. The benefits being able to stay focused and follow your instincts while still having a knowledgeable expert available to step in if they are needed. This appears to be how this midwife practices and teaches her apprentices to practice.

Birth Attendant as Lifeguard

Clarification: I use the term "birth attendant" here to describe a maternity care provider such as a physician or midwife, not a doula. I don't often use this term, but I must have subconsciously chosen to use it while writing this post because it is most appropriate for the role I was trying to describe, the midwifery model's idea of a caregiver who "attends births" rather than "delivers babies."

Since writing my last post about lessons from the freebirth movement, I have been thinking more about the roles of birth attendants. A guest post at The Gift of Giving Life (one of my favorite blogs) written by Heatherlady called On Cows and Chickens, got me thinking even more.

I believe that women are created to be able to birth their babies. I have read a lot about how hormones control birth and how negative emotions affect hormones and thus interfere with birth. I think that when a birth attendant interferes with the delicately balanced natural process of birth, they risk doing more harm than good. And interfering can probably happen easier than we sometimes realize.

People who believe strongly in the natural process of birth, including unassisted birthers, often compare birth to other normal activities that have some small level of risk associated with them, such as driving a car, playing a sport, etc. They argue that we don't need immediate access to medical technology while doing these things, so we shouldn't need it for birth.

My husband hates analogies because people sometimes use things that are not similar enough to make a good comparison, and I often agree (for example, unmedicated childbirth is not like getting teeth drilled and has nothing to do with hitting yourself with a hammer). However, occasionally, I find a good anaolgy. One such analogy, which I originally got from the Hypnobabies program, compares the birth attendant to a lifeguard.

Although birthing is instinctual and swimming is a learned behavior for humans, there are still a lot of similarities between the two. Swimming is an everyday activity, and the risk of drowning is quite low. The website for the International Life Saving Foundation(ILS) cites a drowning rate of 1.2 million people per year. Worldwide, swimming is statistically safer than childbirth, as the World Health Organization statistics from 2005 give a stillbirth rate of about 3.3 million, and a neonatal death rate (during the first 28 days of life) of over 4 million (WHO World Health Report). Worldwide maternal mortality for 2005 was 536,000 (WHO maternal mortality)

Most people who know how to swim feel confident and comfortable doing so freely without immediate access to medical technology. We are cautious with our young children, for whom the risk of death is greater ( the ILS website states that children make up more than 50% of drowning victims). But with the proper precautions (such as careful supervision and use of flotation devices), swimming can be safe and enjoyable for young children as well.

Despite the relative safety of swimming, we have people trained to attempt to make it safer. According to the ILS website:

The terms “lifesaver” and “lifeguard” are used around the world to describe individuals with special training who are stationed to prevent accidents and to respond to life-threatening emergencies in the aquatic environment.

My older brother used to work summers as a lifeguard at one of the community pools in the area we lived. His job involved watching swimmers to make sure they were safe and reminding them the rules that would could protect them from danger (things like no running, no diving in the shallow end, and making sure the area below the diving board is clear before diving). He had special training and certifications for the job, and was paid for it. Life guarding is often over-dramatized in movies and television, where they are always jumping in to save people and doing CPR. My brother never had to rescue anyone, he mostly sat on his tower all day and worked on his tan, but he could have saved someone if he needed to.

The ILS website estimates that those trained in their lifesaving skills make over 1 million rescues a year. Considering the drowning rate of 1.2 million per year, that means they cause a significant reduction. Parents who take their children to a pool with a lifeguard might feel some assurance knowing that there is an extra layer of safety there--an extra pair of eyes watching for danger, someone who is trained in rescue swimming and has current CPR certification.

I like to think of a good birth attendant as being like a lifeguard. They are specially trained professionals who have the skills to save lives when things go wrong. Occasionally, they may remind a birthing mom to breathe deeply or help her relax, but mostly they should sit and watch for signs of problems. "Watching" could possibly include a variety of things (checking hearttones, recognizing pathological labors, checking for tears, monitoring blood loss, ect.), but it should not include routine unnecessary medical intervention (e.g. elective induction, IV drips, pitocin augmentation, artificial rupture of membranes, etc), telling the mother how to birth her baby, or making decisions for her. In the event that there are complications, birth attendants can save lives (by helping get shoulders unstuck, giving pitocin for bleeding, resuscitating an oxygen-deprived newborn, ect.) much like a lifeguard, but if lifeguards were to jump in and pull people out of the water who didn't need saving, they would likely interfere with people learning to swim on their own and ruin people's swimming experiences.

Lessons from the Freebirth Movement

I just finished reading the dissertation Born Free: Unassisted Childbirth in North America by Rixa Freeze, PhD, of Stand and Deliver. All 300+ pages of it. It was very interesting. I have understood for quite a while that some women give birth unassisted because they feel forced into it because of a lack of acceptable options (such as for a women who is going for a VBAC but the hospitals in her area have "banned" it, and DEMs are illegal in her state, or other situations like that) I used to not understand why some women choose unassisted birth (also called "freebirth") when a midwife-attended homebirth would be an option for them, though I always respected their right to choose it. I am ione who would, in the face of limited options, find the best attendant for a hospital I could and fight for the kind of birth I wanted over choosing to "go it alone" at home. Rixa's dissertation gave me insight into the way unassisted birthers think. Here are a few things I learned:

1) UCers believe, as do others in the NCB community, that intervention in the birth process increases the risk of complications occurring. Unlike the rest of the NCB community, they include things other than medical procedures as interventions. Instruction, support, or even the mere presence of a caregiver is seen by the UC community as disruptive to the birth process.

2) UCers highly value intuition. They believe that the parents of the child should be responsible to make all decisions about the birth. They trust that as they birth alone and as focused as possible on their bodies, intuition will guide them to seek out medical help if a need arises for it, which prevents anyone but them from deciding that an intervention is necessary.

3) They believe midwifery is misguided--midwives are trained to "do" too much at births. They also take issue with midwifery being a paid profession. They believe that ideally, birth knowledge would be freely shared among women so every woman can be her own midwife. There would be a few trusted experts who would sometimes provide assistance, but as a service and not a job.

There is a lot more in the dissertation, and I recommend reading it to anyone who is curious about it. I'm still not planning on having any of my own babies unassisted, but I do feel like I understand better where women who do it are coming from. Reading it also got me to think about some things I'd never thought about--questions about what role I would want a midwife to fill at a homebirth. Would I want her to coach me or stand back and watch? Be in the other room? Do I want cervical checks, occasional fetal heart monitoring monitoring, suctioning, etc? I always figured, if I had a homebirth, I'd avoid "unnecessary intervention" by being away from the hospital, but Rixa's dissertation helped me see that there is more to it than that.

So, Rixa, if you ever read this, thanks for sharing your dissertation and all of the insights in it.